imagem top

2023

ANUÁRIO DO HOSPITAL
DONA ESTEFÂNIA

CHULC LOGOlogo HDElogo anuario

SALIVA MOLECULAR TESTING BYPASSING RNA EXTRACTION IS SUITABLE FOR MONITORING AND DIAGNOSING SARS-COV-2 INFECTION IN CHILDREN

Tiago Milheiro Silva1, Marta Alenquer2, Filipe Ferreira2, Onome Akpogheneta3, Mónica Medina-Lopes2, Ana Margarida Garcia1, Vasco Barreto4, Cathy Paulino5, João Costa5, Joao Sobral5, Maria Diniz-da-Costa5, Susana Ladeiro5, José Delgado Alves4, Jocelyne Demengeot3, Ricardo B. Leite5, Maria João Rocha Brito1, and Maria João Amorim2

1 - Unidade de Infecciologia, Área de Pediatria Médica. Hospital Dona Estefânia. Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central.
2 - Cell Biology of Viral Infection Lab, Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal
3 - Lymphocyt Physiology Lab, Instituto Gulbenkian ea Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal
4 - CEDOC NOVA, Centro de Estudos de Doenças Crónicas, Nova Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa; Lisboa, Portugal.
5 - Genomics Unit, Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência; Oeiras, Portugal.

- 21 Congresso Nacional de Pediatria

Resumo
Introduction Methods to easily test SARS-CoV-2 infected children and determine infectivity are in demand. We aimed to determine saliva RT-qPCR accuracy for SARS-CoV-2 detection in children.
Methods Application of SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR in saliva, with and without RNA extraction, in children up to 10-years-old admitted to hospital, regardless of symptoms. Saliva samples were collected up to 48h of a positive test by RT-qPCR on nasopharyngeal swab.
Results Eighty five children were included, mean age of 3.8 years (28 <1year), 29 with COVID19 and the remaining asymptomatic. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of saliva RT-qPCR tests for children below 1-year were 87, 100 and 89.3% with RNA extraction and 86.4, 100 and 88.9% without RNA extraction, compared to nasopharyngeal swabs.  Overall, for children up to 10-years-old: 84.5%, 100% and 91.8% with RNA extraction and 81.8%, 100% and 90.4% without RNA extraction. 8 out of 8 salivas with CTs below 26, from symptomatic and asymptomatic cases, resulted in productive viral infections, whilst 4 out of 4 samples above CT 26 as well as 9 out of 9 negative SARS-CoV-2 samples did not. Antibodies specific for spike and its receptor-binding-domain were only significant for IgMs in the case of discrepancy between NP swab and saliva sampling in SARS-CoV-2 positive cases, with 33.3% children in this group being positive for IgM.
Conclusions: Saliva is a suitable sample to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA in children up to 10-years-old, even bypassing RNA extraction methods. Levels of viral RNA detected were significantly above the infectivity threshold. Further investigation is required to understand if SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels vary during the day and to correlate them with viral transmission.

Palavras Chave: SARS-CoV-2; Saliva